« December 2020 | Main | February 2021 »

January 31, 2021

Samuel Hahnemann

CFF3577D-98F2-4238-A917-139E47C7E3DF.jpeg Posted by JD Hull at 05:14 PM | Comments (0)

January 21, 2021

“The Bells of Rhymney”

I’ve loved “The Bells of Rhymney” since it stood out hauntingly on my first Byrds album when I was about 14. Like any good well-rounded Indian Hill High kid, I looked up its traditional roots in my teenage years. And it meant more and more to me the more I get to hear great church bells of new cities. Anyway, the late folk great Pete Seeger borrowed the lyrics from either the Welsh or the Brits. And Jim-Roger McGuinn got it from old Pete. Some think the song is the first folk rock. I think it’s great music and lyrics. I’ll play the Byrds version later. And since I come from a musical tribe (both Holdens and Hulls) I would love to hear my talented cousin songwriter-musician-singer Diane Healey perform this. Later I’ll come back here and post the song that appears on that 1965 album.

“The Bells of Rhymney”

Oh, what will you give me?
Say the sad bells of Rhymney

Is there hope for the future?
Say the brown bells of Merther

Who made the mine open?
Say the black bells of Rhonda

And who killed the miner?
Say the grim bells of Lina

Who aband' us in court?
Say the bells of Newport

All will be well if-if-if-if-if,
Say the green bells of Cardiff

Why so worried, sister why?
Say the silver bells of Whye
And what will you give me?
Say the sad bells of Rhymney

Oh, what will you give me?
Say the sad bells of Rymney
Is there hope for the future?
Say the brown bells of Merther

Who made the mine open?
Say the black bells of Rhonda
And who killed the miner?
Say the grim bells of Lina

Songwriters: Idris Davies / Pete Seeger

The Bells of Rhymney lyrics © T.R.O. Inc.

Posted by JD Hull at 12:25 PM | Comments (0)

January 17, 2021

Sensitive Litigation Moment No. 1: Crystal, the Missing Notary.

oui__my_love____by_TrixyPixie (1).jpg
Crystal, blowing off work again--and just when you need her.

Not exciting. Just useful. In October of 1976, Congress passed a barely-noticed housekeeping addition to Title 28, the wide-ranging tome inside the U.S. Code governing federal courts, the Justice Department, jurisdiction, venue, procedure and, ultimately, virtually all types of evidence. 28 U.S.C. Section 1746 is curiously entitled "Unsworn declarations under penalty of per­jury".

It allows a federal court affiant or witness to prepare and execute a "declaration"--in lieu of a conventional affidavit--and do that without appearing before a notary. Under Section 1746, the declaration has the same force and effect of a notarized affidavit. Read the 160 word provision--but in most cases it's simple. At a minimum, the witness at the conclusion of her statement needs to do this:

"I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)”.

A "unsworn" declaration with the oath required by section 1746 can be used almost any time you need an affidavit, e.g., an affidavit supporting (or opposing) a summary judgment motion.

Some lawyers who practice in federal courts still don't know about the existence of Section 1746, (probably because so many of us practice primarily in state courts, and we stick to comfortable state practices and folkways). I wouldn't have known about it either; a Justice Department lawyer clued me in on it 20 years ago.

Federal judges understand and accept it. It saves clients, witnesses and lawyers the time, cost and aggravation of getting client statements notarized. Your three notaries--Nadine, Crystal and Raphael the Librarian, together with their notary kits--are in the office like clockwork, except, of course, the very days you need to have them witness and notarize a document. So it's a useful and convenient provision.

Not exciting--but it is one of the few efficient, and reliable, moments anyone sees in the trial process.

[Original WAC/P? post: February 3, 2009]

Posted by JD Hull at 08:31 PM | Comments (0)

January 07, 2021

I didn’t sign up for this.

B6C8FE68-3D6F-49BD-BB4D-670C33044A85.jpeg

I didn’t sign up for this. I didn’t change my party registration from D to R in early 2017 for this. I worked in this building twice in my 20s—for both Senate and House, both Ds and Rs—and it means a lot to me. I lived under its shadow for 15 years. I ‘grew up’ near it. Got married 2 blocks from it. Worked, played, drank, sobered up, loved near it. I even know how the tunnels work on both sides. You don’t charge it. You don’t let people in without the usual checks. Very few of the miles of Trump people yesterday I spent 6 hours with had anything to do with it. But we don’t let this happen here. Ever.

Posted by JD Hull at 06:37 AM | Comments (0)

January 06, 2021

B502E30C-C553-408B-B08A-D06EDE15133E.jpeg

Posted by JD Hull at 05:39 AM | Comments (0)

January 03, 2021

Richard Lewis Thornburgh (1932-2020)

This was a friend, client and mentor since 1985. Always amazed he never became POTUS. Closest thing to Abe Lincoln I’ve ever seen. Character, charm and brains. Formidable work ethic. Gifted lawyer.

He died on Christmas Eve.

“Richard Thornburgh, Former Governor and Attorney General, Dies at 88”

Posted by JD Hull at 03:50 PM | Comments (0)

January 02, 2021

Clients want Excellent--not Perfect. Excellent is way harder than Perfect.

Happy New Year. Time to get back to work.

Remember clients?

Clients 99.5% of the time are not paying you to be perfect. Clients don't want perfect. In the rare instances they do want perfect, they will let you know. So clients want excellent. Be excellent, not perfect. See, e.g., "Rule 10: Be Accurate, Thorough and Timely--But Not Perfect" of our world-famous and irritating but life-changing 12 Rules of Client Service.

APOCALYPSE-NOW-007.jpg
Perfectionism: The horror, the horror. Above: Martin Sheen in Apocalypse Now (photo: Miramax).

Posted by JD Hull at 11:08 PM | Comments (0)